You are viewing jimvanpelt

Previous Entry | Next Entry

In Praise of Locus Magazine

Saturn Ring Blues
The latest issue of Locus hit my mailbox today.  Locus's arrival always perks me up.  Sometimes a story of mine is reviewed, which means my first perusal is always an ego search--today I found that my novel, Summer of the Apocalypse, was voted #7 in the readers' poll for best first novel, right behind my friend, Daniel Abraham's outstanding A Shadow of Summer.  Also, last year's story, "A Small Astral Object Genius" made the best short story list.  If that darned Neil Gaiman story, "How to Talk to Girls at Parties" and the other 28 short stories with more votes than mine hadn't been there, I would have been #1!

Mostly I look forward to Locus, though, for the interviews and news.  I don't pay much attention to the con reports, even to conventions I attended, but I read and reread the in-depth interviews.  This month they featured Peter S. Beagle and Paolo Bacigalupi.  Paolo is a Colorado writer who've I've gotten to know over the last couple of years.  Very cool.

The news keeps me at least semi-aware of what's happening in the publishing world.  Their yearly summation of what's been published and trends in the industry are almost worth the price of the subscription themselves.

A new addition is Cory Doctorow as a columnist.  Like him or not, he always has something interesting to add to the conversation.

I've heard complaints about Locus over the years (the one I hear most is that they hate Analog), but I've never felt a need to complain about their coverage of the field, and it's one of the handful of magazines I try to never let my subscription slip (the others are Analog, Asimov's, Talebones and Blackgate--if I had more time and a bigger budget, I'd also subscribe to F&SF and Realms of Fantasy).  I do buy a lot of single issues of other magazines when I can get them, but Locus  is one I wouldn't want to miss.  I don't even toss them when I'm done reading.  They go into my collection.

Who else subscribes, and why not?
 

Comments

( 11 comments — Leave a comment )
eeknight
Jul. 9th, 2007 08:21 pm (UTC)
I subscribed for a while. Good magazine, but I got tired of my books never being reviewed. Yeah, my books are commercial, but they're not bad. Now I just buy it off the newsstand if there's something I want to read or keep.
the_flea_king
Jul. 9th, 2007 08:41 pm (UTC)
I don't subscribe, and I can never find it on a newsstand. They never cover anything I don't hear about online faster, anyway. If they do, someone emails me about it.
muneraven
Jul. 9th, 2007 09:01 pm (UTC)
I used to by it at a comic book store
I like Locus. But when you are an unpublished writer it can take you away from what you should be doing by making you think about just about everything else BUT writing. No magazine is better at making an unpublished writer feel simultaneous despair, envy, cynicism, dread,and a host of other things when she really should be just...writing.
carnwrite
Jul. 10th, 2007 02:02 am (UTC)
Re: I used to by it at a comic book store
My thoughts exactly! I read it religiously cover-to-cover for a few years, but it got to be sort of depressing as the rejections kept on rolling in. I still have a subscription, but these days I mainly read it to keep up with the books coming out and the interviews.
lmarley
Jul. 9th, 2007 09:46 pm (UTC)
First of all, congratulations! Your novel was worthy, and it's lovely to see it getting some attention. As you know all too well, not always the case.

I subscribe to Locus, but I'm always aware that, although I enjoy reading it, it's a very preaching-to-the-crowd sort of magazine. Well done, but it's more a way to find out what's up with the rest of the community than anything else. I doubt anyone outside of the sf/f gang reads those reviews.

Am I wrong?
jimvanpelt
Jul. 10th, 2007 01:53 am (UTC)
Thank you!

Yes, it's purely an insider's magazine. I don't know what anyone outside of publishing would get out of it. Only a very dedicated fan, I would imagine, would pay the fairly high subscription rate to read the reviews and interviews.
will_ludwigsen
Jul. 9th, 2007 11:41 pm (UTC)
People grumble sometimes about Locus's somewhat cantankerous view of the field--"Good God! Subscriptions are declining! Sales are in the crapper!" and so on--but I kind of enjoy that.

Locus is indispensable to me for keeping up with the genre. Yes, the information is online often but I prefer getting it all in one place.

Plus the interviews are great.

The reviews are usually good, too. There are so many of them, though, that I never read them all. They crank out a lot of content for that magazine every month, and my hat is off to them.

Love the magazine and I've subscribed for probably ten or fifteen years.
dsgood
Jul. 10th, 2007 02:42 am (UTC)
I was annoyed when Locus said Harlan Ellison had behaved badly at the last Worldcon -- without saying what he'd done.
kmarkhoover
Jul. 10th, 2007 05:12 pm (UTC)
I check on Locus occasionally but I don't subscribe to it, mainly because I'm not interested in 'trends'. But they do have good info about anthologies opening up and what is being bought where...I can't deny that. I like the interviews, too.

I must admit after reading your post I am rethinking my current status on Locus...maybe I will get a subscription and try it out long term. Though the Doctorow addition doesn't really sell me....but that's okay, too. I've lived with other elements of other magazines I didn't really like.
tbclone47
Jul. 10th, 2007 07:07 pm (UTC)
Great news about Summer of the Apocalypse (and your short story)! Geez, I glanced at the LOCUS last night (amid the MOUNTAINS of mail I had waiting for me after vacation), and slid right by those results.

Talebones squaked onto the best magazine list at 26.
tbclone47
Jul. 10th, 2007 07:08 pm (UTC)
Oh, and yes, LOCUS is a MUST.
( 11 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

May 2013
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow